Re: Still Active
By: Nightfox to morningstarr on Thu Jan 22 2026 05:55 pm
The RIP protocol (Remote Imaging Protocol) was becoming a thing for BBS
in the early 90s, but as BBSes faded away, there wasn't really enough t
for it to take hold. Aside from that (which I think was the most standardized), I remember seeing a BBS package called RoboBoard that ha
its own GUI standard, and with its client, you had a fairly good GUI experience when connected to a BBS (I remember it looking somewhat like
Windows 3.0). I didn't know MajorBBS had one too.
I tried to install synchronet in linux today..outcome was negative. I watche[vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
---
þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ
I tried to install synchronet in linux today..outcome was negative.
I watched robs video and rtfm and still no luck. I guess I will keep
trying. I did get mystic to compile and run so that's an option.
Mystic is really good, but missing features. Maybe I will have to
settle and run a mystic board, or get a cheap laptop with windows on
it and go that route. I have to be careful on here and make sure I
spell everything correctly and try to use proper punctuation.
Something as simple as that will cause an uproar on here.
Isn't Citadel like that? Maybe that's not it, but there
was a BBS package with a more featureful web interface...
Citadel is kinda like that, but WINServer def is like that.
well i would say citadel is more modern looking than the winserver interface.
It would be nice if some younger persons saw it as an alternative
to what social media has become.
I want to report I exist.
I tried to install synchronet in linux today..outcome was negative. I watched robs video and rtfm and still no luck. I guess I will keep trying.
Dumas Walker wrote to MRO <=-
Are there any active Citadel BBSes, with web interfaces, online?
Only with a couple people. If they bother you, it's better to just
skip their messages and not feed their constant trolling. Every
once in a blue moon, they actually can have a normal conversation
and maybe even be somewhat helpful. ;)
synchronet servers can have a robust website. Maybe even mimick some of the behaviors and features of facebook. That would keep potential new users from
Isn't Citadel like that? Maybe that's not it, but
there was a BBS package with a more featureful web interface...
Citadel is kinda like that, but WINServer def is like that.
well i would say citadel is more modern looking than the winserver interface.
Are there any active Citadel BBSes, with web interfaces, online?
MIKE POWELL wrote to MORNINGSTARR <=-
Luckily, synchronet is pretty popular so as long as you are asking
general questions and not trying to report a bug, you can probably get assistance with it on just about any network... fsx, tqw, etc... with a BBSing forum.
Morningstarr wrote to Nightfox <=-
Yeah major bbs had a gui, it looked like windows 95ish. Reminded me of aol. You could multitask in it too. Good times!
Morningstarr wrote to The Wanderer <=-
I tried to install synchronet in linux today..outcome was negative. I watched robs video and rtfm and still no luck.
Are there any active Citadel BBSes, with web interfaces, online?
I don't know if this system is still operational, but there was a
system:
bbs.iscabbs.com
I don't know if it had or has a web interface, but until a couple of months ago I was able to login to it with telnet.
Since others are posting AI slop to the echoes now...
SYNCHRONET BBS SOFTWARE PRESENTS A COLLECTION OF FUNCTIONAL
CHALLENGES THAT CAN BE CHARACTERIZED AS BOTH PERSISTENT AND
DISCONCERTING IN THEIR STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY - THE CONFIGURATION
SUBSYSTEM DEMANDS A DEGREE OF USER ENGAGEMENT THAT COULD BE
DESCRIBED AS EXCESSIVELY RIGOROUS, AS THOUGH THE SOFTWARE EXPECTS
interfawell i would say citadel is more modern looking than the winserver
I don't know if this system is still operational, but there was a
system:
bbs.iscabbs.com
I don't know if it had or has a web interface, but until a couple of months ago I was able to login to it with telnet.
Are there any active Citadel BBSes, with web interfaces, online?
here's what it looks like
https://www.citadel.org/
Are there any active Citadel BBSes, with web
interfaces, online?
here's what it looks like https://www.citadel.org/
Thanks, I will take a look.
Since others are posting AI slop to the echoes now...snip
SYNCHRONET BBS SOFTWARE PRESENTS A COLLECTION OF FUNCTIONAL CHALLENGES
THAT CAN BE CHARACTERIZED AS BOTH PERSISTENT AND DISCONCERTING IN THEIR STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY
Are there any active Citadel BBSes, with web interfaces, online?
I don't know if this system is still operational, but there was a
system:
bbs.iscabbs.com
I don't know if it had or has a web interface, but until a couple of
months ago I was able to login to it with telnet.
MIKE POWELL wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-
Well at least their AI bot wasn't yelling at them. Did you use some AI that is hosted by Truth?
I know I've told this story multiple times, but my company ended up with a $400 phone bill because the lead developer set it up to poll every 10 minutes.
I had a telco broker who had some interesting ideas. He suggested I purchase call forward on busy service for the hub. It was $3/month. Set the call forward busy destination to the number in the toll area. Set the hub to call "itself". The line was busy, naturally, and forwarded to the destination for essentially a penny a call.
| Sysop: | Morningstarr |
|---|---|
| Location: | Mt. Pleasant Nc |
| Users: | 35 |
| Nodes: | 250 (0 / 250) |
| Uptime: | 21:53:50 |
| Calls: | 161 |
| Calls today: | 161 |
| Files: | 613 |
| U/L today: |
614 files (5,824M bytes) |
| D/L today: |
12,932 files (164G bytes) |
| Messages: | 10,463 |
| Posted today: | 621 |